10 Points to Consider When Choosing a Real User Monitoring Tool

I recently contributed a post to APMDigest.com outlining some key considerations when selecting Real User Monitoring tooling. An extract of this can be found below (read the full thing here):

Tools enabling Real User Monitoring, or RUM (also known as End User Experience, or EUE, and some similar things) have proliferated hugely over the last 10 years, to the point there are now countless hopeful vendors jostling for contention.

RUM certainly adds a powerful additional perspective to external monitoring, and whilst it does not replace “traditional” active (synthetic) testing – they are complimentary – it can dramatically improve some aspects of end-user performance visibility, particularly for companies with a broad international reach.

As always, a crowded marketplace can contain sheep as well as goats. I thought that it may be useful to share some musings on RUM product distinctions. The relative importance of each will depend on particular circumstances, and there is a degree of functional convergence occurring, at least among the players who are carving out significant market share (and who clearly wish to be around for the long-term). Hopefully these will be helpful to the uninitiated who are considering a purchase decision.

To read the ten points in the full post, be sure to make the jump to APMDigest.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s